STEP: State-Aware Task Estimation and Planning with Multi-Modal LLMs for Human-Robot Collaboration
Maitrey Gramopadhye, Prakash Baskaran, Xiao Liu, Songpo Li, Soshi Iba · N/A · 2026
Framework
N/A
License
N/A
Stars
N/A
Summary
Effective human-robot collaboration in industrial settings requires robots to understand human intentions and assist with task planning, reducing workload.
Abstract Summary
Key Points
- Effective human-robot collaboration in industrial settings requires robots to understand human intentions and assist with task planning, reducing workload.
- Recent works have explored the use of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MM-LLMs) for task planning in such data-scarce scenarios, leveraging in-context learning to interpret user actions and generate long-horizon action plans in natural language.
- However, MM-LLMs inherently lack an understanding of system states and do not track state transitions, often leading to hallucinated actions that deviate from the intended goal.
- Additionally, generating action plans in natural language tends to limit the generated plans to a high level, introducing ambiguity in action execution.
- To address these limitations, we propose the State-aware Task Estimator and Planner (STEP), which prompts a MM-LLM to explicitly estimate the state of the system and predict the state transitions resulting from executed actions.
Approach
STEP takes as input the actions performed by an operator and an image of the workstation, along with a set of example interactions to prompt an MM-LLM. As illustrated in Fig. 2 , our pipeline predicts the overall task the operator is trying to accomplish. Simultaneously, it also estimates a structured state representation of the current workspace from its image.
It then uses the estimated task and action history to predict future actions required to complete the task.
Evaluation
We compared our method with a state-of-the-art LTA baseline inspired by the top-down approach proposed by AntGPT [ 9 ] . The baseline consisted of using the same inputs as our method, for task estimation (§ III-A ) followed by a single rollout of action prediction (§ III-C ), with no state information.
We selected this comparison to directly examine the impact of explicitly estimating and tracking the system state on action prediction accuracy.
Sources and Demonstrations
Figures are reproduced from Gramopadhye et al. See the full paper for experimental details and the project page, when the paper links one, for demonstrations and videos.
Related Papers
Actively Resolving Contextual Uncertainty for Underspecified Tasks in Natural Language
Zachary Ravichandran, Jonathan Diller, Fernando Cladera et al.
Foundation models provide robots with the ability to interpret natural language and reason about environmental context, yet most language-conditioned policies assume that goals are well-specified and that task-relevant information is provided upfront via a prior map.
Body-Grounded Replanning for Physically Adaptive Manipulation
Namiko Saito, Hiroshi Kera
Manipulation requires not only reasoning about the external environment, but also about the robot's physical condition.
CIRRA: Dual-Level Continual Instruction Reconciliation with Ongoing Execution for Embodied Robot Agents in Interactive Household Tasks
Ci Zhang, Enfu Nan, Arman Akbari et al.
Household robots must accommodate new user instructions while executing ongoing tasks. Existing agents often regenerate or extensively revise the remaining task sequence, introducing plan ambiguity, logical inconsistency, and redundant execution.
Coding Agents for Generalized Task and Motion Planning Problems
Matteo Merler, Bowen Li, Josh Roy et al.
Task and motion planning (TAMP) problems remain difficult even with full observability and object-centric states because discrete decisions are tightly coupled to geometric, kinematic, and dynamic constraints.