ForeTac-VLA: A Forecasting-Based Tactile-Vision-Language-Action Model for Contact-Rich Robotic Manipulation

ForeTac-VLA: A Forecasting-Based Tactile-Vision-Language-Action Model for Contact-Rich Robotic Manipulation

Zhengyu Tao, Xin Li, Xin Wang · N/A · 2026

Framework

N/A

License

N/A

Stars

N/A

Summary

Vision-language-action (VLA) models have demonstrated strong capabilities in robotic manipulation, yet their reliance on visual perception limits robustness in contact-rich environments, where critical physical interaction states may not be visually observable.

Abstract Summary

Vision-language-action (VLA) models have demonstrated strong capabilities in robotic manipulation, yet their reliance on visual perception limits robustness in contact-rich environments, where critical physical interaction states may not be visually observable. Existing tactile-enhanced VLA methods improve physical grounding using observed tactile feedback, but most remain largely reactive rather than explicitly modeling how contact may evolve. Therefore, we propose ForeTac-VLA, a forecasting-based tactile-vision-language fusion model that predicts future tactile states to guide action generation. Specifically, ForeTac-VLA encodes recent tactile observations into temporal representations and integrates them with vision-language features through bidirectional cross-attention. Further, a transformer-based forecasting module predicts multi-step future tactile states, enabling the model to reason jointly over observed and anticipated contact. Finally, the fused multimodal representations and predicted future tactile states are fed into the VLA backbone to condition action generation. To stabilize training, a ground-truth-to-prediction curriculum is employed when early forecasts are unreliable. Across four real-world contact-rich manipulation tasks, ForeTac-VLA achieves an average success rate of 95%, outperforming the fine-tuned VLA model by 36.25 percentage points and state-of-the-art tactile-enhanced VLA baselines by over 22 percentage points. ForeTac-VLA also maintains strong performance under low-illumination and visually cluttered conditions. Video demonstrations can be found on https://foretac-vla.github.io/

Key Points

  • Vision-language-action (VLA) models have demonstrated strong capabilities in robotic manipulation, yet their reliance on visual perception limits robustness in contact-rich environments, where critical physical interaction states may not be visually observable.
  • Existing tactile-enhanced VLA methods improve physical grounding using observed tactile feedback, but most remain largely reactive rather than explicitly modeling how contact may evolve.
  • Therefore, we propose ForeTac-VLA, a forecasting-based tactile-vision-language fusion model that predicts future tactile states to guide action generation.
  • Specifically, ForeTac-VLA encodes recent tactile observations into temporal representations and integrates them with vision-language features through bidirectional cross-attention.
  • Further, a transformer-based forecasting module predicts multi-step future tactile states, enabling the model to reason jointly over observed and anticipated contact.

Method

In this section, we first introduce the overall architecture of ForeTac-VLA (Sec. III-A), followed by the bidirectional cross-attention module for multimodal fusion (Sec. III-B). We then present the transformer-based multi-step future tactile forecasting module (Sec. III-C). Finally, we describe the training procedure in Sec. III-D. As illustrated in Fig.

, ForeTac-VLA is built upon the pretrained $\pi_{0.5}$ VLA model and extends it with temporal tactile encoding, bidirectional cross-attention, and multi-step future tactile forecasting.

Method — ForeTac-VLA: A Forecasting-Based Tactile-Vision-Language-Action Model for Contact-Rich Robotic Manipulation
Fig. 4: Qualitative comparison of predicted and ground-truth future tactile changes during a representative contact transition. Results are shown for the left and right tactile sensors at four future horizons, $t+5$, $t+10$, $t+15$, and $t+20$, corresponding to approximately 83, 167, 250, and 333 ms, respectively.

Experiments

In this section, the experiments are presented across five aspects: (1) Experimental Setup : the real-robot platform, manipulation tasks, data collection and training procedures, and evaluation approach and metrics; (2) Experimental Results : comparisons with the fine-tuned VLA model and state-of-the-art tactile-enhanced VLA models; (3) Ablation Study : the contributions of tactile input, future tactile forecasting, and multimodal fusion; (4) Robustness and Generalization : performance under challenging visual conditions, including low-illumina...

Experiments — ForeTac-VLA: A Forecasting-Based Tactile-Vision-Language-Action Model for Contact-Rich Robotic Manipulation
Fig. 5: Robustness evaluation environments for four contact-rich manipulation tasks. The top row shows the low-illumination environment, and the bottom row shows the visually cluttered environment with task-irrelevant objects introduced into the workspace.

Sources and Demonstrations

Figures are reproduced from Tao et al. See the full paper for experimental details and the project page, when the paper links one, for demonstrations and videos.

Share

Related Papers

A Sim-to-Real Integration Pipeline for Training and Deployment of Chunk-Based VLA Manipulation Policies
arXiv preprint

A Sim-to-Real Integration Pipeline for Training and Deployment of Chunk-Based VLA Manipulation Policies

Mathilde Kappel, Clémence Grislain, Mohamed Chetouani et al.

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have become a prominent paradigm for mapping multimodal inputs, including semantic instructions, visual observations of the scene, and proprioceptive observations, to robot actions.

manipulation vision vla reinforcement-learning sim-to-real control learning-from-demonstration benchmark
PDF Advanced
Capability-Aware Arbitration for Semantic Intent-Based Shared Control
arXiv preprint

Capability-Aware Arbitration for Semantic Intent-Based Shared Control

Zhaoda Du, Michael Bowman, Xiaoli Zhang

Shared control often allocates robot authority based on confidence in inferred human intent, assuming reliable autonomous execution. When this assumption fails, high intent confidence can cause over-helping.

manipulation vision vla reinforcement-learning control learning-from-demonstration benchmark
Code PDF Intermediate
GitHub ★ —
DexVerse: A Modular Benchmark for Multi-Task, Multi-Embodiment Dexterous Manipulation
arXiv preprint

DexVerse: A Modular Benchmark for Multi-Task, Multi-Embodiment Dexterous Manipulation

Yunchao Yao, Zhuxiu Xu, Tianqi Zhang et al.

Building general-purpose dexterous manipulation policies requires benchmarks that go beyond isolated tasks to systematically evaluate policies across diverse interaction modes, sensory conditions, and robot embodiments.

manipulation vision vla reinforcement-learning control learning-from-demonstration benchmark
PDF Advanced