X-NavDP: Generalizing Navigation Diffusion Policy to Novel Behavior and Embodiments with Group Q-score Reweighted Matching
Tianyu Yang, Yiming Zeng, Wenzhe Cai, Yuqiang Yang, Jiaqi Peng, Hui Cheng, Jiangmiao Pang, Tai Wang · N/A · 2026
Framework
N/A
License
N/A
Stars
N/A
Summary
Pretraining navigation diffusion policies rely on large-scale expert demonstrations. These data are typically generated by a fully-informed oracle planner suited to a single nominal robot.
Abstract Summary
Key Points
- Pretraining navigation diffusion policies rely on large-scale expert demonstrations
- These data are typically generated by a fully-informed oracle planner suited to a single nominal robot.
- This limits the policy's generalization to diverse embodiments and challenging scenarios (e.g., escaping dead ends or detouring long obstacles) that demand diverse local reactive behaviors with only onboard local observations.
- Post-training the policy with reinforcement learning (RL) offers a principled remedy
- However, previous RL for diffusion approaches lead to only marginal improvements
Preliminaries
Following the prior works [ 30 , 5 ] , we formulate visual navigation as a conditional trajectory generation problem. Given an observation $\mathbf{o}_{t}$ consisting of RGB-D images and a goal specification $\mathbf{g}$, the policy generates an action chunk $a^{0}=\{(x_{i},y_{i})\}_{i=1}^{H}$ containing $H$ future waypoints through iterative denoising.
The forward diffusion process adds Gaussian noise over $K$ steps: where $\beta_{k}$ is the noise schedule.
Method
X-NavDP is an RL post-trained diffusion policy for navigation, built upon the pretrained NavDP [ 5 ] . Fig. 2 shows the overall pipeline. Given local visual observations and navigation goals, our policy outputs an action chunk with $H$-step future waypoints.
Our core objective is to enhance policy performance through online interactive simulation experience, while preserving the generalization ability of the pretrained model.
Experiments
We design experiments to answer four questions: (1) Does X-NavDP outperform strong navigation baselines across different embodiments and scenes? (2) Does RL post-training induce new navigation behaviors such as recovery and replanning? (3) How much does each proposed component contribute to the final performance? (4) What failure modes remain?
We build our simulation benchmark in IsaacLab [ 18 ] using scenes from GRScenes-100 [ 43 , 8 ] . For RL post-training, we use 56 training scenes, including 47 home scenes and 9 commercial scenes.
Sources and Demonstrations
Figures are reproduced from Yang et al. See the full paper for experimental details and the project page, when the paper links one, for demonstrations and videos.
Related Papers
A Low-Cost, Open Platform for End-to-End Autonomous Driving on a Miniature Ackermann Vehicle
Gustavo Claudio Karl Couto, Eric Aislan Antonelo, Gabriel George Zipperer
This paper presents a low-cost, open experimental platform for research in end-to-end autonomous driving with miniature Ackermann vehicles.
End-to-End Vision-Language-Action Policies for Autonomous Lunar Rover Docking
Sitan Huang, Grace Gao
Surface navigation on the Moon is subject to extreme illumination contrast and deployment-time perceptual disturbances.
FACT: A Multimodal Force-Action-Track Foundation Model for Human-to-Robot Dexterity
Zhi Cao, Yining Hong, Jiaolong Yang et al.
Human demonstrations offer a scalable alternative to costly robot data collection for dexterous manipulation, but most human datasets lack force measurements.
Has GPT-6-Astra Achieved Embodied Intelligence?
SenseNova, Joint Research Team, : et al.
GPT-6-Astra demonstrates a level of competence in robotic manipulation and navigation that challenges the conventional paradigm of building specialized models for individual tasks and embodiments.