SkeleWAM: Skeleton World-Action Modeling for Efficient Robotic Manipulation
Juyi Sheng, Hua Wang, Mengyuan Liu · N/A · 2026
Framework
N/A
License
N/A
Stars
N/A
Summary
World action models (WAMs) combine robot action generation with future state prediction. Existing WAMs typically predict videos or learned visual latents, which represent interaction geometry only implicitly and may retain appearance information unrelated to control.
Abstract Summary
Key Points
- World action models (WAMs) combine robot action generation with future state prediction
- Existing WAMs typically predict videos or learned visual latents, which represent interaction geometry only implicitly and may retain appearance information unrelated to control.
- We introduce SkeleWAM, a compact WAM that represents a manipulation scene as a sparse 3D skeleton composed of robot joints, object centers, and interaction points.
- Constructed online from current RGB-D observations and robot proprioception, the skeleton provides a unified geometric state for action generation and future skeleton prediction.
- Future skeleton prediction provides additional geometric supervision for action learning without requiring visual reconstruction.
Method
Given a language instruction $\ell$, the current RGB-D observation $o_{t}$, and the robot proprioceptive state $q_{t}$, our objective is to generate an action chunk where $\mathbf{a}_{t+i}\in\mathbb{R}^{d_{a}}$ denotes a single robot action, $H_{a}$ is the action horizon, and $d_{a}$ is the action dimension.
SkeleWAM represents the current scene as a sparse 3D skeleton, where $N$ is the number of skeleton nodes and $\Phi_{\psi}$ is the skeleton extractor described in Section 3.2 .
Experiments
We evaluate SkeleWAM on the full LIBERO-Plus benchmark [ 6 ] , which contains 10,030 variants across seven perturbation categories. We report zero-shot task success rates without fine-tuning on the evaluation variants. Table 1 compares SkeleWAM with VLA policies and world-model-based methods.
We compare SkeleWAM with representative VLA policies, including OpenVLA, OpenVLA-OFT, NORA, UniVLA, $\pi_{0}$, $\pi_{0}$-Fast, and $\pi_{0.5}$.
Sources and Demonstrations
Figures are reproduced from Sheng et al. See the full paper for experimental details and the project page, when the paper links one, for demonstrations and videos.
Related Papers
A Phenomenology of Neural Geometry in Vision-Language-Action Models
Mozes Jacobs, Aiden Swann, Mathilde Papillon et al.
Robotic manipulation is inherently geometric, but what shape does the world take inside the policy that performs it?
A Sim-to-Real Integration Pipeline for Training and Deployment of Chunk-Based VLA Manipulation Policies
Mathilde Kappel, Clémence Grislain, Mohamed Chetouani et al.
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have become a prominent paradigm for mapping multimodal inputs, including semantic instructions, visual observations of the scene, and proprioceptive observations, to robot actions.
Autonomous Droplet Navigation via Model-Based Reinforcement Learning: Zero-Shot Transfer and Emergent Dynamics
Rajneesh Anand, Mayuresh V. Kothare
Self-driving laboratories (SDLs) are transforming chemical and materials discovery through closed-loop automation, yet automated infrastructure for physical manipulation of soft, deformable matter remains beyond current robotic platforms.
Beyond Reconstruction: What Matters in Action Tokenization for Robot Policies?
Haoran Chen, Jingtian Ji, Samuel Wheeler et al.
Autoregressive action-token policies such as vision-language-action models require action tokenizers to translate discrete token sequences into precise control actions in continuous space. Many action tokenizers learn the mapping between tokens and actions via a reconstruction objective.