ReVAMP: Vector-Accelerated Motion Planning for Kinematically-Constrained Systems via Reparameterization

ReVAMP: Vector-Accelerated Motion Planning for Kinematically-Constrained Systems via Reparameterization

Shrutheesh R. Iyer, Thomas Cohn, Zachary Kingston · N/A · 2026

Framework

N/A

License

N/A

Stars

N/A

Summary

Robots often must satisfy one or more constraints during motion planning for real-world tasks. When such constraints reduce the valid configuration space to a measure-zero subset, sampling based planning algorithms require modifications to draw feasible samples.

Abstract Summary

Robots often must satisfy one or more constraints during motion planning for real-world tasks. When such constraints reduce the valid configuration space to a measure-zero subset, sampling based planning algorithms require modifications to draw feasible samples. For many common end-effector constraints, parameterizations built on inverse kinematics (IK) provide an alternate formulation where the constraints are satisfied by construction, allowing directly sampling the feasible set. Despite their elegant approach, parameterized planners have remained slower than vector-accelerated implementations of projection-based approaches, leaving their performance ceiling an open question. We explore a new axis of vectorization built upon reparameterizing the planning space through analytic IK. This approach addresses existing inefficiencies in vectorized projection-based planners and exposes new opportunities for parallelism within the planner. We show that the planner can synthesize plans in microseconds to milliseconds for high dimensional systems (up to 20 dimensions), with complex constraints, up to 10x faster than the current state-of-the-art. Furthermore, we demonstrate how such planning speeds open up avenues for restructuring sequential manipulation pipelines.

Key Points

  • Robots often must satisfy one or more constraints during motion planning for real-world tasks
  • When such constraints reduce the valid configuration space to a measure-zero subset, sampling based planning algorithms require modifications to draw feasible samples.
  • For many common end-effector constraints, parameterizations built on inverse kinematics (IK) provide an alternate formulation where the constraints are satisfied by construction, allowing directly sampling the feasible set.
  • Despite their elegant approach, parameterized planners have remained slower than vector-accelerated implementations of projection-based approaches, leaving their performance ceiling an open question.
  • We explore a new axis of vectorization built upon reparameterizing the planning space through analytic IK.

Preliminaries

Let $C\subset\mathbb{R}^{d}$ be the configuration space of a robot with $d$ degrees of freedom, where a configuration $q\in C$ is typically the vector of actuated joint angles. In the presence of environment obstacles, $C_{\text{free}}\subset C$ denotes the subset of configurations that are not in collision. A robot typically interacts with the environment through its end-effector(s), EE(s).

Preliminaries — ReVAMP: Vector-Accelerated Motion Planning for Kinematically-Constrained Systems via Reparameterization
Figure from the paper. Source: ReVAMP: Vector-Accelerated Motion Planning for Kinematically-Constrained Systems via Reparameterization.

Methodology

In this work, we propose a new compilation axis for a robot: the analytic inverse kinematics routine, and the subsequent reparameterization that is constructed from it. Starting from the analytic solver, we transform the generated routines into branchless and vectorizable units that map parameterized configurations into joint configurations in parallel.

This allows multiple configurations in the reparameterized space to be resolved simultaneously using SIMD parallelism.

Methodology — ReVAMP: Vector-Accelerated Motion Planning for Kinematically-Constrained Systems via Reparameterization
Figure 5 : Real-world maze-setup, with obstacles that block the maze and the $C$-space.

Experimental Evaluation

We evaluate our planner across different robots, with increasing DoF, and constraint complexity. All methods were evaluated on the same set of problems on a 5.4GHz Intel i7-13700K CPU with 64GB of RAM, unless specified otherwise. Each experiment highlights a distinct benefit of the planner and its potential implications.

For the FR3 with a plane constraint, we show that planning on $SE(2)$ provides better scaling and strict constraint satisfaction.

Sources and Demonstrations

Figures are reproduced from Iyer et al. See the full paper for experimental details and the project page, when the paper links one, for demonstrations and videos.

Share

Related Papers

AD-WM: Action-Discriminative World Models for Counterfactual Model Predictive Control
arXiv preprint

AD-WM: Action-Discriminative World Models for Counterfactual Model Predictive Control

Jiabin Qiu, Zixuan Chen, Hongye Cao et al.

Latent world models are typically trained to predict factual transitions, whereas model predictive control (MPC) must compare alternative actions from the same state. A model can therefore achieve low factual prediction error yet poorly distinguish candidate actions.

manipulation reinforcement-learning planning control
Code PDF Intermediate
GitHub ★ —
AHEAD: Anticipatory Hand-Driven Teleoperation via Human Intent Prediction
arXiv preprint

AHEAD: Anticipatory Hand-Driven Teleoperation via Human Intent Prediction

Seok Joon Kim, Junho Lee, Federica Spinola et al.

Direct hand-driven teleoperation maps an operator's hand motion to robot end-effector commands at every frame, enabling precise control, but it requires constant monitoring and correction during approach, grasp, and placement, which can be slow and fatiguing.

manipulation reinforcement-learning planning control learning-from-demonstration
PDF Intermediate
Autonomous Droplet Navigation via Model-Based Reinforcement Learning: Zero-Shot Transfer and Emergent Dynamics
arXiv preprint

Autonomous Droplet Navigation via Model-Based Reinforcement Learning: Zero-Shot Transfer and Emergent Dynamics

Rajneesh Anand, Mayuresh V. Kothare

Self-driving laboratories (SDLs) are transforming chemical and materials discovery through closed-loop automation, yet automated infrastructure for physical manipulation of soft, deformable matter remains beyond current robotic platforms.

manipulation vision reinforcement-learning planning control
Code PDF Intermediate
GitHub ★ —