DriftOPD: Sequence-Level Reverse-KL Distillation for One-Step VLA Policies

DriftOPD: Sequence-Level Reverse-KL Distillation for One-Step VLA Policies

Youngjun Jun, Kyumin Choi, Youngmin Kim, Seonghyun Jin, Sunwoo Park, Jangho Park, Jong Chul Ye · N/A · 2026

Framework

N/A

License

N/A

Stars

N/A

Summary

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models increasingly rely on action experts that generate short action chunks under receding-horizon control.

Abstract Summary

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models increasingly rely on action experts that generate short action chunks under receding-horizon control. While chunk-level training is convenient across robot embodiments, it optimizes local action likelihood without explicitly accounting for long-horizon task success. Sequence-level reinforcement learning can address this limitation, but typically requires policy rollouts and closed-loop interaction, which are costly for real-robot manipulation. We introduce DriftOPD, a teacher-free, rollout-free framework for sequence-level on-policy distillation of continuous VLA action experts. We show that the sequence-level reverse Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence decomposes into a chunk-level reverse-KL term and a future-potential term that captures the long-horizon effect of the current action. DriftOPD optimizes these two terms using a one-step drifting objective and a Q-function critic learned from offline demonstrations, respectively, enabling sequence-level optimization with only offline data and one-step action generation. Across multiple VLA architectures in simulation and real-world manipulation, DriftOPD generally outperforms existing one-step distillation baselines while achieving task success performance comparable to multi-step teacher policies. These results demonstrate that long-horizon behavior can be effectively distilled into one-step VLA action experts without online interaction or a separate teacher.

Key Points

  • Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models increasingly rely on action experts that generate short action chunks under receding-horizon control.
  • While chunk-level training is convenient across robot embodiments, it optimizes local action likelihood without explicitly accounting for long-horizon task success.
  • Sequence-level reinforcement learning can address this limitation, but typically requires policy rollouts and closed-loop interaction, which are costly for real-robot manipulation.
  • We introduce DriftOPD, a teacher-free, rollout-free framework for sequence-level on-policy distillation of continuous VLA action experts.
  • We show that the sequence-level reverse Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence decomposes into a chunk-level reverse-KL term and a future-potential term that captures the long-horizon effect of the current action.

Preliminary

On-policy distillation (OPD) minimizes the reverse Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) between a model distribution $q_{\theta}$ and a target distribution $p$ over model-generated sequences ( Gu et al., 2024 ) : where $c$ is the conditioning context and $\bm{x}=(x_{1},\ldots,x_{T})$ is an autoregressively generated sequence.

Preliminary — DriftOPD: Sequence-Level Reverse-KL Distillation for One-Step VLA Policies
Figure 2: Comparison of VLA training paradigms. (a) Standard VLA training uses demonstration-supervised forward KLD, (b) existing one-step distillation optimizes chunk-level reverse KLD, and (c) RL relies on closed-loop rollouts, whereas (d) DriftOPD approximates sequence-level reverse KLD using a drifting objective and critic guidance without online rollouts.

Method

We formulate VLA learning through the reverse KLD between the distributions over action sequences induced by the model and target policies. This sequence-level perspective is illustrated in Figure 2 . Let $t$ index the action-chunk sequence, with $\bm{s}_{t}$ denoting the current VLA context (e.g., observation, instruction, and action state) and $a_{t}$ the corresponding action chunk.

Method — DriftOPD: Sequence-Level Reverse-KL Distillation for One-Step VLA Policies
Figure 3: Analysis of critic guidance for sequence-level VLA policy optimization on RoboCasa365 with GR00T N1.6. (a) Critic $Q$ over episode progress for demonstrations, successful rollouts, and failed student rollouts. (b) Task success rate versus $\lambda$ on the atomic_seen suite.

Experiment

We experimentally evaluate and analyze the effectiveness of DriftOPD on robot manipulation tasks.

We use the $\pi_{0.5}$ ( Black et al., 2025a ) , GR00T N1.5/N1.6 ( Bjorck et al., 2025 ) , and ABot-M0 ( Yang et al., 2026a ) vision language action models, covering fully finetuned models, LoRA ( Hu et al., 2022 ) finetuned models, models finetuned on selected VLM layers, and a JiT ( Li and He, 2026 ) -style model that directly predicts clean actions.

Experiment — DriftOPD: Sequence-Level Reverse-KL Distillation for One-Step VLA Policies
Figure 4: GPU time to success: policy calls $\times$ per-call latency (idle B200, batch 1) (Bars: total GPU time per success, including failed episodes; Diamonds (parenthesized): mean over successful episodes).

Sources and Demonstrations

Figures are reproduced from Jun et al. See the full paper for experimental details and the project page, when the paper links one, for demonstrations and videos.

Share

Related Papers

A Sim-to-Real Integration Pipeline for Training and Deployment of Chunk-Based VLA Manipulation Policies
arXiv preprint

A Sim-to-Real Integration Pipeline for Training and Deployment of Chunk-Based VLA Manipulation Policies

Mathilde Kappel, Clémence Grislain, Mohamed Chetouani et al.

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have become a prominent paradigm for mapping multimodal inputs, including semantic instructions, visual observations of the scene, and proprioceptive observations, to robot actions.

manipulation vision vla reinforcement-learning sim-to-real control learning-from-demonstration benchmark
PDF Advanced
Capability-Aware Arbitration for Semantic Intent-Based Shared Control
arXiv preprint

Capability-Aware Arbitration for Semantic Intent-Based Shared Control

Zhaoda Du, Michael Bowman, Xiaoli Zhang

Shared control often allocates robot authority based on confidence in inferred human intent, assuming reliable autonomous execution. When this assumption fails, high intent confidence can cause over-helping.

manipulation vision vla reinforcement-learning control learning-from-demonstration benchmark
Code PDF Intermediate
GitHub ★ —
DexVerse: A Modular Benchmark for Multi-Task, Multi-Embodiment Dexterous Manipulation
arXiv preprint

DexVerse: A Modular Benchmark for Multi-Task, Multi-Embodiment Dexterous Manipulation

Yunchao Yao, Zhuxiu Xu, Tianqi Zhang et al.

Building general-purpose dexterous manipulation policies requires benchmarks that go beyond isolated tasks to systematically evaluate policies across diverse interaction modes, sensory conditions, and robot embodiments.

manipulation vision vla reinforcement-learning control learning-from-demonstration benchmark
PDF Advanced