Persistent Profile-Guided Reset-Free Recovery Improves Final Gait Selection after Irreversible Leg Damage

Persistent Profile-Guided Reset-Free Recovery Improves Final Gait Selection after Irreversible Leg Damage

Minjoong Kim · N/A · 2026

Framework

N/A

License

N/A

Stars

N/A

Summary

Damage-recovery algorithms often rank gaits from short trials, yet a gait that performs well briefly may not remain effective during continued execution. In reset-free recovery, each trial also changes the physical state inherited by the next.

Abstract Summary

Damage-recovery algorithms often rank gaits from short trials, yet a gait that performs well briefly may not remain effective during continued execution. In reset-free recovery, each trial also changes the physical state inherited by the next. We introduce persistent profile-guided reset-free recovery (PGRR), which predicts multiple outcomes over repeated gait execution and uses conservative uncertainty-aware estimates to guide short online probes without resetting the robot. Across 108 matched MuJoCo tasks spanning leg amputation, distal fracture, and joint lock, PGRR improves final quality by 0.106 and slot-averaged recovery quality (SRQ) by 0.044 relative to an IT&E-inspired Gaussian-process baseline, while reducing low-quality failures by 27.8 percentage points. Final-quality gains occur in all three damage classes. Against no adaptation, PGRR also improves final quality and reduces low-quality failures, whereas the aggregate SRQ difference is inconclusive. Development ablations identify conservative uncertainty handling as the clearest supported contributor to the observed gains. These results show that PGRR can identify stronger post-damage gaits under continuous physical state and that final-gait quality and recovery-summary performance provide complementary evidence for evaluating reset-free recovery.

Key Points

  • Damage-recovery algorithms often rank gaits from short trials, yet a gait that performs well briefly may not remain effective during continued execution.
  • In reset-free recovery, each trial also changes the physical state inherited by the next
  • We introduce persistent profile-guided reset-free recovery (PGRR), which predicts multiple outcomes over repeated gait execution and uses conservative uncertainty-aware estimates to guide short online probes without resetting the robot.
  • Across 108 matched MuJoCo tasks spanning leg amputation, distal fracture, and joint lock, PGRR improves final quality by 0.106 and slot-averaged recovery quality (SRQ) by 0.044 relative to an IT&E-inspired Gaussian-process baseline, while reducing low-quality failures by 27.8 percentage points.
  • Final-quality gains occur in all three damage classes

Problem and Evaluation

Figure 1 shows the structural conditions. We simulate a hexapod with two actuated joints per leg in MuJoCo, using a 5-ms time step [ 16 ] . Its gait lifts, advances, and lowers each foot before stance. Damage is applied at a prescribed time without resetting pose, velocity, or contacts. Amputation detaches a whole leg and disables its two actuators. Fracture detaches the distal segment and disables one actuator.

Joint lock fixes both joints at their damage-time positions and disables their actuators. Detached segments remain as dynamic debris.

Problem and Evaluation — Persistent Profile-Guided Reset-Free Recovery Improves Final Gait Selection after Irreversible Leg Damage
Fig. 1: The four evaluated structural states at a common scale. Amputation removes a full leg, fracture removes its distal segment, and joint lock freezes both joints. Orange components are detached dynamic debris; yellow marks an immobilized leg. Illustrative renders use leg 1 at 0.30 s after damage and do not depict a measured recovery outcome.

Profile-Guided Recovery

Figure 2 presents the method in execution order. Panel A describes the offline stage. Each candidate gait is executed repeatedly to form a long-horizon profile, and five GP models per target predict eight outcomes and their uncertainty for candidate gaits. Panel B describes online adaptation after damage.

The policy selects a candidate conservatively, executes a 0.75-s probe, extends viable probes by another 0.75 s, uses the observation to correct its predictions, and runs the current incumbent for 0.75 s as a bridge.

Profile-Guided Recovery — Persistent Profile-Guided Reset-Free Recovery Improves Final Gait Selection after Irreversible Leg Damage
Fig. 2: PGRR from offline profiling to continuous online execution. (a) Repeated execution reveals behavior that a short probe can miss; twelve 0.75-s segments followed by a 3-s endpoint interval supply eight prediction targets. (b) Conservative selection, viability-gated probes, online correction, and incumbent bridges repeat until a stopping condition or the ten-trial budget. (c) Conventional independent-reset evaluation is shown only as a conceptual contrast. PGRR carries pose, velocity, contacts, position, and damage through adaptation and into the separately scored 3-s final interval. Robot snapshots are rendered from MuJoCo development runs; yellow marks the locked leg. Curves and timelines are schematic.

Experimental Protocol

The holdout crosses three damage types, previously unused legs 3–5, friction $\{0.865,1.135\}$, onset $\{1.73,2.37\}$ s, and three candidate seeds. This gives 36 physical conditions and 108 condition–seed tasks. The algorithm, surrogate, metrics, and evaluation procedure were fixed before opening this set. The reported holdout is now consumed and cannot serve as fresh validation after further tuning.

The three adaptive methods share the candidate pool and maximum trial budget.

Experimental Protocol — Persistent Profile-Guided Reset-Free Recovery Improves Final Gait Selection after Irreversible Leg Damage
Fig. 3: Holdout outcomes for the four methods. Bars show means and 95% task-bootstrap intervals. Higher is better for (a) SRQ and (b) final quality; lower is better for (c) low-quality failure rate ($q_{F}\leq 0.05$). Each damage class has 36 condition–seed comparisons. No-adaptation results are reused across seeds. Amputation and fracture remain difficult in absolute terms.

Results

Across the 108 tasks, PGRR improves SRQ by 0.044 and final quality by 0.106 relative to the IT&E-inspired GP; the low-quality failure rate decreases by 0.278. All three paired intervals exclude zero (Table I ). Final quality improves within amputation, fracture, and joint lock, with joint lock showing the largest paired gain.

Figure 3 shows that PGRR also has higher mean SRQ than the GP comparator in every damage class, although the amputation- and fracture-specific SRQ intervals include zero (Table I ).

Results — Persistent Profile-Guided Reset-Free Recovery Improves Final Gait Selection after Irreversible Leg Damage
Fig. 4: Post-hoc recovery-slot profiles (mean and 95% task-bootstrap interval). Slots average executed probe, extension, and bridge segments; slots after early stopping are filled with final quality. The shaded final region shows the separate 3-s endpoint, with small horizontal offsets for readability. The x-axis is not elapsed time. Padded tails are not additional measurements of sustained walking.

Sources and Demonstrations

Figures are reproduced from Kim See the full paper for experimental details and the project page, when the paper links one, for demonstrations and videos.

Share

Related Papers

4D Radar Perception Algorithms for Autonomous Driving: A Review
arXiv preprint

4D Radar Perception Algorithms for Autonomous Driving: A Review

Xumin Wu, Jun Zhou, Jilin Mei et al.

Research on 4D millimeter-wave radar perception algorithms has flourished in recent years, extending from signal processing and object detection to semantic segmentation, motion estimation, occupancy prediction, and dynamic scene reconstruction.

vision reinforcement-learning benchmark
PDF Beginner