At a glance

  • Problem: hand-written and preference-learned rewards have different failure modes. Source
  • Idea: pair formal reward generation with a video-preference residual reward. Source
  • Evidence: ten simulation tasks and a five-task UR5 transfer study. Source

Evaluation scope Real-robot evaluation uses UR5 arms, matched simulation setups and marker or color-based tracking, with 20 repetitions per method. Source

CoRe connects formal reward search, video preference learning and the policy-training loop. Original figure

How it works

  1. Generate and refine code-based rewards using language models and preference feedback. Source
  2. Learn complementary rewards from video preferences, then combine both signals for policy training. Source
Preference alignment checks how a task is completed, not only whether a completion signal was triggered. Original figure

Evidence & results

  • In simulation, mean success across seven MetaWorld tasks is 99.0%, versus 75.5% for Eureka. SoftGym uses different metrics. Evidence
  • Real UR5 hammer success is 80% for CoRe versus 25% for Text2Reward; these are task-specific transfer results. Evidence

Limitations & boundaries

  • Iterative model queries remain necessary; robustness in more diverse, unstructured settings is future work. Source
  • Marker-assisted evaluation should not be mistaken for fully unconstrained visual deployment. Source

Takeaway

Reward decomposition makes explicit task structure and visual feedback complementary rather than competing alternatives. Source

Resources

Figures: the paper's authors. Editorial source and image review: 2026-10-21. Findings are author-reported, not independently reproduced by Robotics Research Hub.

Original abstract

Reward design remains a central challenge in reinforcement learning (RL). Hand-crafted rewards are often difficult to specify and may lead to suboptimal policies, while learned rewards from preferences can suffer from inefficiency and unstable training. Inspired by the dual nature of human learning explored in cognitive science, we decompose rewards into two complementary components: Formal Rewards (FR), explicitly designed based on task knowledge, and Residual Rewards (RR), learned from observations to capture implicit and nuanced preferences. Based on this decomposition, we propose CoRe, a hybrid framework that integrates FR and RR with vision-language models (VLMs) feedback to achieve preference-aligned policies without human involvement. Our contributions are twofold: (1) We propose a Formal Reward Module (FRM) that leverages VLMs to iteratively design and optimize FR based on task knowledge and preference feedback, enabling the continual improvement of policy during training; (2) We introduce a Residual Reward Module (RRM) that learns RR from video-level preference by employing VLMs to generate preference labels and capturing nuanced rewards that complement FR, ensuring alignment with human intent. Through the synergy of FRM and RRM, CoRe enables the automatic construction of reliable rewards that are efficient and preference-aligned. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CoRe outperforms existing approaches in terms of policy learning effectiveness and efficiency on ten robotic manipulation tasks in simulation and five real-worlds. Videos can be found on our project website: https://core-2026.github.io/

Citation
Share